[UK-CONTEST] AFS

[G4LMW]

Ken

I must admit that I am not sure that it would occur to me to declare ALL my 
equipment.

If I had the linear in line, I might easily put "K3, 400W". I would have 
thought it was obvious that I was therefore using a linear!

Regards
Rob, G4LMW


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ken Eastty" <ken.g3lvp at btinternet.com>
To: <uk-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] AFS


> Liked the format too & agree with Stewart, perhaps we should substitute
> the pointless 5NN with the Locator! Might get a few more UBN's.
> I've often wondered why each contact is either worth either 10 points or
> nothing, now with computerised logging & checking couldn't a partly
> broken QSO be awarded half points otherwise just score at 1 point/QSO.
> As equipment details form part of the entry submission then all those
> who declared K3's etc. running 400W should be disqualified, they
> obviously aren't telling the truth (& "linear" isn't enough either) why
> are so many people shy about the equipment that they use?
>
> 73...
>
> Ken
>
> G3LVP
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 7
>> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:18:43 -0000
>> From:<stewart at gm4aff.net>
>> Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] AFS CW 2012 - Results published
>> To: "'UK Contest Reflector'"<uk-contest at contesting.com>
>> Message-ID:<002d01ccf602$5a3fcd40$0ebf67c0$@gm4aff.net>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>>
>> I also like the format, but I really would like to see the station's
>> locations too. Then we can see where the winners and centres of activity
>> are. I think that's all there is to doing well!...
>>
>> 73
>> Stewart
>> GM4AFF
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com
>> [mailto:uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Steve Knowles
>> Sent: 27 February 2012 20:44
>> To: UK Contest Reflector
>> Subject: [UK-CONTEST] AFS CW 2012 - Results published
>>
>> Results of the 80m CW AFS Contest 2012 are now available at
>>
>> http://www.rsgbcc.org/cgi-bin/hfresults.pl?Contest=AFS%20Contest%20CW&year=2
>> 012
>>
>> or can be accessed by following the link from the RSGB Contest Committee
>> Results page.
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Steve  G3UFY
>> _______________________________________________
>> UK-Contest mailing list
>> UK-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2113/4836 - Release Date: 02/27/12
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 8
>> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:00:29 +0000 (GMT)
>> From: Roger Cooke<g3ldi at yahoo.co.uk>
>> Subject: [UK-CONTEST] Mapping entrants to AFS
>> To: "UK-Contest at contesting.com"<UK-Contest at contesting.com>
>> Message-ID:
>> <1330426829.71922.YahooMailNeo at web28305.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>>
>> I like Stewart's idea, but I think it would impose a lot of work on the 
>> contest committee. It might
>> help with the CCs as well. It would be nice to look at those sort of 
>> statistics.
>>
>> ?
>>
>>
>> Regards from Roger, G3LDI
>> Swardeston, Norfolk.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> UK-Contest mailing list
>> UK-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>>
>>
>> End of UK-Contest Digest, Vol 110, Issue 38
>> *******************************************
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
>
>