[UK-CONTEST] Power Limitations
Rob Harrison
robharrison at g8hgn.freeserve.co.uk
Sat Jan 28 13:01:14 PST 2012
Hi,
> It's maybe just me, but the gap between the thinking processes and
> interests
> of UK HF contesters and UK VHF contesters seems to be widening.
Yes I agree, unfortunately CC wants the opposite to happen.
> In the U.S.A. they have a separate reflector for VHF contesting and HF
> contesting - seems like a good idea.
Again I agree, see above.
> 2. it is *impossible* to regulate contest entrants on the basis of
> antenna
> gain, ERP or any other variable quantity which would have to be measured
> accurately on-site to be valid (even then the results could be challenged)
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Tran GM3WOJ" <zl1ct1 at gm7v.com>
To: <uk-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] Power Limitations
> Hello all
>
> Jeepers my Delete key is worn out by this latest thread !
>
> Let's have a reality check :
>
> 1. there is no such thing as a 'level playing field' in contesting
> (except
> something approaching it in WRTC as mentioned)
>
> 2. it is *impossible* to regulate contest entrants on the basis of
> antenna
> gain, ERP or any other variable quantity which would have to be measured
> accurately on-site to be valid (even then the results could be challenged)
>
> It's maybe just me, but the gap between the thinking processes and
> interests
> of UK HF contesters and UK VHF contesters seems to be widening.
>
> In the U.S.A. they have a separate reflector for VHF contesting and HF
> contesting - seems like a good idea.
>
> 73
> Chris
> GM3WOJ / GM2V
>
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
More information about the UK-Contest
mailing list