[UK-CONTEST] REAL REPORTS ?

[Rob Harrison]

Hi,

Oh, I didn't realise that both parties got a UBN, I thought it was only the 
party that was adjudged the errorer.

Maybe it's different for VHF where I do 99.9% of my contesting, as I've not 
had any where I wasn't the errorer, and in the QSO I quoted the other party 
certainly didn't know of the error, so presumably hadn't got a UBN.

73 Bob G8HGN

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Sergeant" <dave at davesergeant.com>
To: "uK-Contest" <uk-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] REAL REPORTS ?


> Not so Bob, both parties will see that QSO listed in their UBN even
> though they have not lost points themselves. As in my original posting
> where I stated that I had lost no points but around 10 QSOs were listed
> where the other station miscopied my details.
>
> 73 Dave G3YMC
>
> On 29 Jun 2012 at 14:10, Rob Harrison wrote:
>
>> I wasn't really apportioning blame, just let each party know in a
>> "disputed" QSO that there had been an error somewhere. The adjudicator
>> has to decide one way or another, but then only the adjudged guilty
>> party knows (via UBN), not the possible other culprit. I agree in most
>> circumstances both should not be penalised.
>>
>
>
> http://www.davesergeant.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> UK-Contest mailing list
> UK-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest