[UK-CONTEST] Separate reflectors?

QUENTIN COLLIER q.g.collier at btinternet.com
Sat Oct 27 05:22:07 EDT 2012


Personally I fall into category 2 - but I don't support splitting UK CONTEST. That would encourage the HF/VHF split which surely has to be undesirable. Keeping the two halves together encourages cross fertilisation of ideas. And what about 6m which has characteristics of both HF & VHF (if we're lucky....)?
 
Prefixing postings as HF or VHF might perhaps be a workable halfway house.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
73,




Quin G3WRR  


________________________________
From: Roger Western <g3sxw at btinternet.com>
To: Contest Reflector UK <uk-contest at contesting.com> 
Sent: Friday, 26 October 2012, 20:41
Subject: [UK-CONTEST] Separate reflectors?

I agree, Graham. I imagine that most reflectees are interested in only HF or only VHF. It's like putting rugby and football players in the same room, hardly any overlap. Here's a a quick and dirty survey. Answers to me directly please, let's not clog the reflector (hit 'Reply', not 'Reply All'). Just pick one number, referring to your level of interest in UK-Contest reflector postings, and add your call-sign. (I won't have time to read long descriptions).
73 de Roger/G3SXW.

I am:
1 - only interested in HF
2 - more interested in HF than VHF
3 - interested equally in HF and VHF
4 - more interested in VHF than HF
5 - only interested in VHF
6 - I have no opinion


-----Original Message----- From: G4FNL
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 7:53 PM
To: 'UK contest Committee'
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] UK AC M5 mults

I agree (I think) - and for the same reason, it would be great if we had
separate VHF / HF contest reflectors too - don't you think?
73 Graham G4FNL 
_______________________________________________
UK-Contest mailing list
UK-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest


More information about the UK-Contest mailing list