[UK-CONTEST] Separate reflectors?

John Lemay john at carltonhouse.eclipse.co.uk
Sat Oct 27 07:50:01 EDT 2012


Ken

 

So, there were no issues with the rules for HF NFD this year ? No issues
regarding "log adjustments" recently ?

 

John G4ZTR

 

 

  _____  

From: UK-Contest [mailto:uk-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ken
Chandler
Sent: 27 October 2012 10:56
To: QUENTIN COLLIER
Cc: Contest Reflector UK; Roger Western
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] Separate reflectors?

 

Im easy on either, but lots of unsavory comments, in-fighting behavior, toys
thrown outa the pram coming from the VHF fraternity, something we don't get
at HF!!! 

Ken..G0ORH / M3i

Sent from my iPhone


    


On 27 Oct 2012, at 10:22, QUENTIN COLLIER <q.g.collier at btinternet.com>
wrote:

Personally I fall into category 2 - but I don't support splitting UK
CONTEST. That would encourage the HF/VHF split which surely has to be
undesirable. Keeping the two halves together encourages cross fertilisation
of ideas. And what about 6m which has characteristics of both HF & VHF (if
we're lucky....)?

Prefixing postings as HF or VHF might perhaps be a workable halfway house.








73,




Quin G3WRR 


________________________________
From: Roger Western <g3sxw at btinternet.com>
To: Contest Reflector UK <uk-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, 26 October 2012, 20:41
Subject: [UK-CONTEST] Separate reflectors?

I agree, Graham. I imagine that most reflectees are interested in only HF or
only VHF. It's like putting rugby and football players in the same room,
hardly any overlap. Here's a a quick and dirty survey. Answers to me
directly please, let's not clog the reflector (hit 'Reply', not 'Reply
All'). Just pick one number, referring to your level of interest in
UK-Contest reflector postings, and add your call-sign. (I won't have time to
read long descriptions).
73 de Roger/G3SXW.

I am:
1 - only interested in HF
2 - more interested in HF than VHF
3 - interested equally in HF and VHF
4 - more interested in VHF than HF
5 - only interested in VHF
6 - I have no opinion


-----Original Message----- From: G4FNL
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 7:53 PM
To: 'UK contest Committee'
Subject: Re: [UK-CONTEST] UK AC M5 mults

I agree (I think) - and for the same reason, it would be great if we had
separate VHF / HF contest reflectors too - don't you think?
73 Graham G4FNL
_______________________________________________
UK-Contest mailing list
UK-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
_______________________________________________
UK-Contest mailing list
UK-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest
_______________________________________________
UK-Contest mailing list
UK-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/uk-contest

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 7632 (20121026) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com





__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 7632 (20121026) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 7632 (20121026) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



More information about the UK-Contest mailing list