[VHFcontesting] CW

[Bill Olson]

Hi Warren, Ooops, what I *meant* was the "non-cw only" portion of the band. 
As far as being more VHF operators... I guess i meant weak-signal types that 
would be interested in contests.. I always thought we were in the EXTREME 
minority.. it sure seems that way..  - bill

>From: "Warren J. Walsh" <wwalsh at skyweb.net>
>To: vhfcontesting at contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] CW
>Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 11:26:10 -0500
>
>At 15:37 1/24/02 +0000, Bill Olson wrote:
>>For one thing, there are a LOT less of us, for another thing, we are
>>dealing a whole lot more with signals at the noise level, for another
>>operators regularly use CW in the non-cw part of the band. The point I am
>>making is that CW is and should be just one way to make a contact that you
>>otherwise would not. It is just a natural part of VHF operation!
>
>I would think that there would be MORE VHF/UHF operators then HF since
>almost everyone has operator privileges there.  I also didn't know there
>were NON-CW portions of the bands, I thought CW was allowed on ALL of our
>frequencies (except maybe 14.233MHz, where anything other then SSTV is
>prohibited :-) )!
>
>
>73
>Warren - K2BM
>
>_______________________________________________
>VHFcontesting mailing list
>VHFcontesting at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting


_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx