[VHFcontesting] Re: Knight T-175 amp good or bad???

Rogers, Ron RR124640 at Exchange.AtlantaGA.NCR.com
Fri Mar 1 09:30:27 EST 2002


No, it was designed as the matching amplifier for the TR-106 6 meter AM
transceiver. Same cabinetry and paint scheme. In fact, if you look on the
side of a T-175 cabinet you will notice the 2 holes for the mic hanger clip
that came with the TR-106 and TR-108, the 2 meter version. 
I also built one of the TR-108 units and matching VFO for both the TR-106
and TR-108. Still have both units to this day.....mint condition, wrapped
up, and stored away.  I had even added a varactor modulator to the TR-108
and used it on 2 Mtr repeaters when that rage started back in the late 60's.

Ron 
-WB8ERB-


-----Original Message-----
From: Dale Parfitt [mailto:parinc at gte.net]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 8:53 AM
To: Cboone at earthlink.net
Cc: Qrpvhf at aol.com; vhfcontesting at contesting.com; vhf at w6yx.stanford.edu
Subject: [VHFcontesting] Re: Knight T-175 amp good or bad???




Cboone at earthlink.net wrote:

> If memory serves, the T-175 is a great little amp for six meters..
> I have never heard anything bad about them...they of course were sold
> as a compliment to the T-150 xmtr....I THINK it uses 811s (correct me
> if I am wrong)...but as long as it doesnt use sweep tubes, you should
> not have a problem
> ($75 is a good price if its in good shape)
>
> Chris
> WB5ITT

More likely it was designed for the T-60 transmitter. The T-150 was already
a
hi power  transmitter.

Dale W4OP

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting



More information about the VHFcontesting mailing list