[VHFcontesting] captive rovers = Red Herring - TYPO!!!!!!

Warren Walsh mcw1wjw9 at optonline.net
Wed Jul 30 18:11:02 EDT 2003



>I went to the list archive to see what Tree's original question was:
>
>http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/vhfcontesting/2003-July/002684.html
>
> > What would the consensus be if a rover was found to have made 60
> > QSOs with only one station.  Would that be a problem?  Or maybe 36 QSOs?
> >
> > What if there were a number of cases like that with a single station?
> >
> > Tree K7RAT
>
>I see mention from Tree of it being against the rule, and NO request for a 
>rule change.

The above line should have been:

I see "NO" mention from Tree of it being against the rule, and NO request 
for a rule change.

Sorry for the typo!

73
Warren - K2BM



More information about the VHFcontesting mailing list