[VHFcontesting] Timely results = Increased activity & better submittal?

[David A. Pruett]

At 10:53 AM 5/25/03 -0400, Ed Kucharski wrote:
>Getting the results sooner would be great and maybe set a new standard for 
>faster result turn-around times for all ARRL contests.

A lot of people think that just because we have electronic logs, the 
results can be almost instantaneous.  Perhaps that can be true once people 
learn to send in Cabrillo logs that are not broken in some way.

I check the logs for the ARRL 160M and 10M contests and a significant 
percentage of logs received need some sort of manual editing.  The robots 
catch some of the mistakes (primarily in the file header), and has improved 
the situation greatly.  However, for the 2002 ARRL 10M contest, out of 
2100+ electronic logs over 200 needed editing...that's 10%.

Recently, at the 2003 Contest Forum, the question was asked of the 
attendees "How many people check the contents of their Cabrillo file before 
they mail it?"  Only, about 20-25% of the audience raised their hands.

I can't speak for Tree or the other logchecking teams, but we spend more 
time importing logs than we do verifying the results.  I'm sure you 
participants would rather it be the opposite.  You want results 
sooner?  Make sure your Cabrillo log is correct.

73,

Dave/K8CC