[VHFcontesting] Insights to Consider

[Kenneth E. Harker]

On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 10:21:43PM -0400, Ev Tupis wrote:
> Kenneth E. Harker wrote:
> 
> >As I said in a 
> >previous post, the ARRL personnel you are abusing _are_ serious VHF 
> >operators and they _do_ know a thing or two about VHF weak signal 
> >operation.  
> 
> Stop speaking for me in a public forum, will you?  Please?  I mean really. 
> Please?  Stop making statements and ascribing them to me.
> 
> I have n-e-v-e-r said that ARRL personnel are not serious VHF operators nor 
> that they don't know anything about VHF weak signal operation.  

Ev, you wrote the following on 21 July 2004: "Personnel at the ARRL has 
changed. The folks that are there have little `organizational memory' on 
some items...and because they don't operate VHF contests themselves, have 
little experience to rely upon when attempting to render judgement on 
(apparent) rules infractions."  You can see it in the archives here:
http://lists.contesting.com/_vhfcontesting/2004-07/msg00140.html

We know _exactly_ which ARRL personnel are presently responsible for 
deciding the ARRL VHF contest rules, and they do, in fact, "operate VHF 
contests themselves," and have been doing so for decades in many cases.
Perhaps you were speaking of some other personnel at ARRL who have ammesia 
and don't operate VHF contests?  If so, please, provide callsigns or 
something to help us out.

>                                                                 These are 
> YOUR words, not mine.  Stop it.  Please?  Pretty please?  Pretty please 
> with a Heath HW-29 "Sixer" on top?
> 
> Ev Tupis, W2EV
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

-- 
Kenneth E. Harker WM5R
kenharker at kenharker.com
http://www.kenharker.com/