[VHFcontesting] Fwd: Re: 2007 VHF QSO Party - Log Submission Robot Issues - W4SHG

[Robert Cumming]

>Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:10:17 -0400
>To: Steve Gilmore <shg at midatlanticbb.com>
>From: Robert Cumming <w2bzy at cfl.rr.com>
>Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] 2007 VHF QSO Party - Log Submission 
>Robot Issues - W4SHG
>
>Steve
>
>The latest Cabrillo is looking for 1.2G, 2.3G and 3.4G for the band 
>designator.
>
>Cabrillo QSO templates
>
>     * freq is frequency/band:
>           o 1800 or actual frequency in KHz
>           o 3500 or actual frequency in KHz
>           o 7000 or actual frequency in KHz
>           o 14000 or actual frequency in KHz
>           o 21000 or actual frequency in KHz
>           o 28000 or actual frequency in KHz
>           o 50
>           o 144
>           o 222
>           o 432
>           o 902
>           o 1.2G
>           o 2.3G
>           o 3.4G
>           o 5.7G
>           o 10G
>           o 24G
>           o 47G
>           o 75G
>           o 119G
>           o 142G
>           o 241G
>           o 300G
>
>
>
>See:  http://www.kkn.net/~trey/cabrillo/qso-template.html for 
>details on Cabrillo V3.0
>
>Also the Subject line must be only your Call sign.  Not as in the 
>past -Call sign, class and power (i.e. W2BZY Single Op Low Power)
>
>I'm, so glad the ARRL tells us in advance that they are changing the 
>rules - Kinda makes you think they are making it harder for the VHF+ 
>community to submit logs = we will go away.
>
>
>VRY 73
>Bob Cumming
>W2BZY
>QRV 160M-3CM (5760 next)
>from EL98hr
>
>
>At 08:43 PM 6/11/2007, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>Hello all,
>>
>>Sorry I was unable to get on for most of the contest from FM18hk but I did
>>manage to get on for the last four (4) hours and found activity a bit light.
>>
>>I submitted my dismal little log and got all my 1.2, 2.3 and 3.4 QSO's
>>rejected.
>>
>>I suspect an issue with the robot so hold off a day or so on submitting your
>>logs as I have sent an email to the ARRL contest branch to ask for
>>assistance.
>>
>>N1MM, N3FJP and the Web based Cabforms all produce the same output.
>>ARRL Robot does not recognize 1.2, 2.3 or 3.4 as a valid VHF band.
>>
>>I think it may be a little issue and when I get a response I will post the
>>update here.
>>
>>Thanks to all I was lucky enough to work .....
>>
>>Respectfully Submitted
>>Steve Gilmore - W4SHG
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>VHFcontesting mailing list
>>VHFcontesting at contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting