[VHFcontesting] JT65 Mode - QSOs valid?

[aa4zz at aol.com]

Joe Taylor provided a good rebuttal in DUBUS magazine,?unfortunately you are looking only at one side of the argument as SM2CEW did not post Joe's rebuttal.


73 Paul AA4ZZ







At 05:07 PM 1/13/2008 -0800, Tim Coad wrote:
>I have read some pretty convincing articles that the validity of
>contacts made with the JT65 "deep search" mode are pretty iffy. Such as this
>article: http://www.sm2cew.com/jt65.html.
>
>But I have not read a rebuttal to the specific points he makes.  His article
>in my mind makes me not to want to pursue this mode until I hear more
>details.
>
>Any one here familiar with these criticisms?
>
>Tim - NU6S
>_______________________________________________
>VHFcontesting mailing list
>VHFcontesting at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

73, Robert KR7O/YB2ARO, DM07ba/OI52ee  (ex.  N7STU)
kr7o at vhfdx.com

www.vhfdx.com (KR7O/YB2ARO homepages)



_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting


________________________________________________________________________
More new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://webmail.aol.com