[VHFcontesting] 756 PRO III

[Paul Kiesel]

For many of us the 7700 and 7800 are not options. But,
even if they were, it would be a real decision for me
to spend that much more money when my ProIII clearly
works very well for me. My only complaint would be
that the noise blanker is non-functional on broad
pulse powerline noise.

K7CW

--- Gregg Seidl <k9kl at centurytel.net> wrote:

> I used a 756 PRO II until I  got my 7800 then I used
> the 7800 on 6 with the 
> II as a backup until I got my 7700.The 756 is a fine
> rig,the scope is GREAT 
> at helping you see an opening.You won't be
> disappointed with a III.They are 
> great radios.I've heard reports of some liking the
> 7700 better then the 7800 
> on 6 meters,I haven't had enough time to really
> compare but the 7800 is 
> simply FANTASTIC.Coupled to a PW-1 amp it is simply
> wonderful to use.  Gregg 
> K9KL 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting at contesting.com
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>