[VHFcontesting] Rover to Rover Zero Pts

[Jim Forsyth]

Mark, I think you got right to the heart of the matter. Clearly what is 
needed is a rule that would penalize the West coast rovers but still allow 
the North East rovers to have fun. Perhaps it could be explicitly written in 
the rules, something like .........this rule applies only to west coast 
rovers and not to North East rovers.

Jim, AF6O

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Mark Adams, PE" <k2qo at mac.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 4:57 AM
To: <vhfcontesting at contesting.com>
Subject: [VHFcontesting] Rover to Rover Zero Pts

> Calling all rovers! If rover-rover contacts are worth ZERO points, how
> many of you will continue to rove?
>
> Most rovers in the north east work many other rovers during a contest.
> Entering unlimited to allow these few Qs to count is dumb as is not
> counting them in the regular category. What is wrong with the present
> rule of 100 max Qs with another rover for the regular rover category?
> At any given time out on the road, we have 1-5 other rovers in range.
> Nothing is more fun that working a VE rover across Lake Ontario in one
> grid and then again the next day in two other grids. Take this away
> and the enthusiasm level will plummet! Have 1/2 the rovers stay home
> and see how the scores turn out!
>
> 73,
> Mark K2QO/r
> FN03ra
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.19/1941 - Release Date: 2/9/2009 
> 6:50 AM
>
>