[VHFcontesting] 20 perent rule
frank bechdoldt
k3uhf at hotmail.com
Tue Feb 10 11:50:18 EST 2009
The 20 percent rule has issues. Some people would delete contacts to avoid the 20 percent rule and the other party would get busted on the log checker. But it could be tweeked.
If the rule read that all contacts are logged and the rover will assign points and multipliers to a number of contacts no greater than 20 percent of his non rover contact count. It would be workable in the software or hand math when sending in a log.
This also shows why these groups now hide their logs from public scrutiny via the ARRL committee structure.
The uglyness of the matter is that WAYNE”S group is morally flawed when it comes to this issue. In my view he is taken his talents to a dark side. It is sad when you have something so fundamentally flawed that you have to create rules for one group’s unreasonable action, even after these actions were directly addressed by the ARRL and a compromise was offered. The ARRL created a “cease fire” on this issue and Wayne figured a work around.
He’s kind of like the Iranians sending in the Palestinians and Lebanese to do their dirty work against Israel to irritate the US. When Isreal complains or does something Iran says Israelis are the bad guys.
The ARRL has a flawed contest. They should not support it in its current fashion or they should fix it. We all pay dues to have an honest contest. We can not sit quiet because the ARRL may think there is no way to regulate Wayne.
So I as a rover who does not put roving on a high priority any more because of Wayne’s group Am willing to give up my rover to rover QSO’s to eliminate the cancer that is on the rover rules. I am sorry if I am sugar coating this too much.
I think a percentage system could be worked out. The failure with the last rule change is that they did not think about it skeptically in terms on how one man who is on their committee could stick his finger in the eyes of the majority of the committee. This is an ugly problem. If this was a town council he would be ran out for not respecting the wishes of the committee as a whole. Not for having a dissenting vote or set of ideals.
History has shown this behavior before. Congress says no money for the Contras, and Ollie North does a work around on the behalf of the president. This is the same thing here. The VUAC and ARRL stated their intent and Wayne engineered a work around.
Sorry I had to use political terms, but it’s terms we can all relate too, even if Ollie is your hero.
Like reporting crime and a meth epidemic, this controversy will go on until its fixed. It would be sad if I loose all my rover to rover QSOs, but at least it would make me want to play rover more.
K3uhf
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect.
http://windowslive.com/howitworks?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_allup_howitworks_022009
More information about the VHFcontesting
mailing list