[VHFcontesting] 902 vs. 903

[aa4zz at aol.com]

Contesters should have the chioce to run whever they need to go to make contacts.

73 Paul AA4ZZ


-----Original Message-----
From: Rogers, Ron <RR124640 at ncr.com>
To: Michael E Fox (N6MEF) <n6mef at mefox.org>; vhfcontesting at contesting.com
Sent: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 3:03 pm
Subject: Re: [VHFcontesting] 902 vs. 903



Do we need a rules change to force contest operations to one frequency
segment or the other. Has someone found a scoring advantage by using one
band segment rather the other. :)

Ron
WW8RR 


-----Original Message-----
From: vhfcontesting-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:vhfcontesting-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Michael E Fox
(N6MEF)
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 2:06 PM
To: vhfcontesting at contesting.com
Subject: [VHFcontesting] 902 vs. 903

This question has probably been answered before but I can't seem to find
the answer.

 

33cm transverters seem to be either 902 or 903MHz, not both. So I guess
I need to pick one.  On the West coast (Northern California), which is
used more frequently and why?

 

Thanks in advance,

Michael - N6MEF

 

 

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting