[VHFcontesting] Category alignment [was: one stop (pass) grids]

Ev Tupis w2ev at yahoo.com
Wed Feb 18 05:51:06 EST 2009


To the questions you raised...

> From: frank bechdoldt <k3uhf at hotmail.com>

> However it is not practical, fair (oh gosh I said fair, look
> out) nor good for stationary contestants.

In what way is it unfair to stationary contestants?

> If the point is to work as many people as possible why
> should I ignore someone if I am in a grid for a 5 minute leg
> of a road only to get there later at my desired local.

The point is *not* to work as many people as possible.  It *is* to align Rover rules with that of all other classes of entry.  All other participants must work as many people as possible from a single location within a Grid-4.

> But the better way to do this is to either engineer the rules
> to match the intent of the contest, 

That is what the "three simple rules" intend to do.  The problem that I am observing is that the "genie is out of the bottle" and there is a sense of strategy entitlement at play.

Ev, W2EV



      


More information about the VHFcontesting mailing list