[VHFcontesting] rover rules

[Mike (KA5CVH) Urich]

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 18:15, Ev Tupis <w2ev at yahoo.com> wrote:

> I understand your point-of-view, Steve.  I tend to be a root-cause analyst out of laziness.  If I can fix something once, I will.  Revisiting the same issue cyclically makes me grumpy. :)


Mike contends

Then why not just do away with any rover to rover contacts at all.
After all this would eliminate any further problems that may arise
when people find ways to exploit these.  And yes I am trying to
punctuate the absurd by being absurd.

-- 
Mike Urich, KA5CVH
http://ka5cvh.com

If pro is opposite of con.
Then what is the opposite of progress?