[VHFcontesting] Rules, opinions, and emails

[wa4kxy at bellsouth.net]

I have nothing to do with that.  You need to discuss with KX9X the how, why and when they do what they do with regards to publishing the rules.

73
Jim, W4KXY
-------------- Original message from John Kemker <john at kemker.org>: -------------- 


> Jim, might it be appropriate for the ARRL to either announce the rules 
> clarification on www.arrl.org or in QST? We might be a bit late for 
> QST, but something on the web page might reach a few more operators than 
> just this list alone. 
> 
> BTW: hope to see you at the Atlanta Hamfest next weekend! 
> 
> wa4kxy at bellsouth.net wrote: > Being a member of the VUAC I will respond to this. The short answer is yes we do those things but we are only human and their are oversights. Frankly, we just didn't think about this issue. As a result KX9X has to step in and apply his interpretation, best guess, etc. For what it is worth I have no problem with the reponse from KX9X. Yes, it may not be what was written but it is a reasonable answer in light of what has been past practice with the limited multi and other categories. This is a good lesson for those of you out their who are reading these rules like they are the word of God or something. They were 
> written by people such as myself. It is difficult if not impossible to think of 
> every possible scenario and even more difficult to write the rules for every 
> possible scenario so lighten up and apply some common sense like KX9X has. 
> > 
> > 73 
> > Jim, W4KXY 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> --JohnK 
> 73 de W5NNH 
> 10X 75371/M&M 117/SMIRK 6185/Six Club 285/TRA 2499/Norcross 228 F&AM 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- 
> avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. 
> Virus Database (VPS): 090527-0, 05/27/2009 
> Tested on: 5/28/2009 4:21:45 PM 
> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2009 ALWIL Software. 
> http://www.avast.com 
> 
> 
>