[VHFcontesting] VUAC Survey input/ debate

frank bechdoldt k3uhf at hotmail.com
Thu Feb 11 08:25:33 PST 2010


I have reports of :

 

During the contest there were non contestants (formally assisted) spotting non assisted people on some of the web pages.  This was not to help the non assisted people, but to help the formally assisted people get more QSOS and contacts and ultimately QSL cards for working these individuals. In the last contest Non assisted qso numbers doubled while the number of registered participants dropped because of the loss of  an category.

 

The ARRL can not police the web pages.  Unassisted people benefit from the activity of others no matter how they communicate or spot  with each other.  The current rules has their head in the sand on this issue. The only fair way to do it is to acknowledge that all sorts of assistance exists and other than exchanging actual QSO information all classes are allowed to spot or be spotted.  That or police the web pages and all spotted call signs are registered and sent to the ARRL to ensure they are listed as assisted.  A major scandal like this happened one with a CQ HF contest where someone documented unassisted people were being spotted and the QSO times matched the spots. Why expose an ARRL contest to that?

 

k3uhf
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469230/direct/01/


More information about the VHFcontesting mailing list