[VHFcontesting] Contest Confusion

[beamar]

I made no phone calls, sent or received no e mails and did not visit any chat rooms. But, I would be in favor of (almost) anything that would increase activity. Here in Florida there was little activity, for this contest. It was disgusting. My best DX was W4ZRZ in EM 63 - 472 miles or thereabouts - the only reason that we made that QSO was that we both just happened to have our antennas pointed at each other, when ZRZ called CQ. How many more great contacts, did I miss because of 10 degrees of antenna heading? 

Buddy WB4OMG 
EL 98

On Sep 16, 2013, at 8:37:24 AM, "Chuck Gress" <chuckgress at hotmail.com> wrote:

From:	"Chuck Gress" <chuckgress at hotmail.com>
Subject:	[VHFcontesting] Contest Confusion
Date:	September 16, 2013 8:37:24 AM EDT
To:	"VHF Contesting" <vhfcontesting at contesting.com>
Now that the September 2013 VHF Contest is in the history books, wouldn't it be nice to have the rules re-written on spotting nets, chat rooms, Ping Jockey etc. I have never seen a contest where a Multi-Multi Op station writes a message in a Chat Room saying that some of his QSOs were invalid because he used a Chat Room. Help us PLEASE!

K3NXH

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting