[VHFcontesting] Cabrillo mode for a JT65 QSO??

VE3DS ve3ds at acanac.net
Fri Jun 19 16:53:04 EDT 2015


Using N1MM + and the robot kicked out my WSJT contact with VE1SKY until I put RY for the mode, then it took it..
Wonder why N1MM’s ARRL QSO party log program put in a non permitted cabrillo…

73 Dana VE3DS

> On Jun 19, 2015, at 4:28 PM, Roger Rehr W3SZ <73w3sz at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Dave,
> 
> I agree with what you say to do, log it as RY.
> 
> My reasoning is based on the fact that I upload my logs to LOTW and use that for Awards purposes.  So a mode designation is needed that will [1] be acceptable to Cabrillo and [2] be acceptable to LOTW, and which will [3] likely "work" what your QSO partner has uploaded to LOTW to give you a confirmed QSO in LOTW.
> 
> For digital modes and LOTW, the ARRL states at:
> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/LoTW%20Instructions/TQSL%202_0%202013/Secodary%20operations/Digital%20Modes.pdf
> 
> "LoTW will match a QSO as long as the calls, time (+/-30 minutes), date, band and mode are the same. For digital modes all digital sub mode (PSK31, JT65, JT9, MT63,OLIVIA, etc.) will qualify as DATA. (The same applies for voice modes. All voicemodes qualify as PHONE).  That is to say that if you log a QSO as PSK31 and the other operator logs the same QSO as RTTY then LoTW will match the QSO, assuming all other parameters match, and each operator will be credited with DATA"
> 
> And the chance that your QSO partner will log a digital QSO as some digital mode, I believe, is significantly greater than the chance that he will log it as "PHONE" or a phone mode.
> 
> So RY it is :)
> 
> 73,
> 
> Roger Rehr
> W3SZ
> 
> On 6/19/2015 12:44 PM, David Pruett wrote:
>> Ken,
>> 
>> PSK is not a legitimate Cabrillo mode.  According to the published Cabrillo 3.0 specification on the WWROF site, these are the only legitimate Cabrillo modes:
>> 
>> CW
>> PH
>> FM
>> RY
>> 
>> Based on this, even W5ZN's suggestion to show it as SSB (which was almost certainly the mode your transceiver was set for) doesn't comply.
>> 
>> As some have suggested, the mode is not a scoring parameter in the ARRL VHF contest, so perhaps it doesn't matter.  In the end,  it all boils down to what the ARRL contest robot and the logchecker will accept.
>> 
>> If it were me, I would do like K7CW suggested and change it to RY.  Then there can be no argument that it is legitimate Cabrillo data representing a digital mode QSO.
>> 
>> 73, Dave/K8CC
>> 
>> On 6/19/2015 10:27 AM, Kenneth Silverman wrote:
>>> We made some JT65 EME QSOs in the June VHF contest.  Is there a correct
>>> mode to use, or is mode irrelevant?  We currently have it marked as PSK.
>>> 
>>> Many thanks, Kenny K2KW - C6ATA in the contest.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> VHFcontesting mailing list
>>> VHFcontesting at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> VHFcontesting mailing list
>> VHFcontesting at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
> 
> _______________________________________________
> VHFcontesting mailing list
> VHFcontesting at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting



More information about the VHFcontesting mailing list