[VHFcontesting] Transmit Performance of the 222MHz Transverters Store Transverters (aka Ukranian Transverters)

[aa9il at sbcglobal.net]

I was curious about these transverters - nice price - Im saving my pennies for the Elecraft transverter.  I already have the 2 meter Elecraft so building up a common platform stack with 222 and 432MHz to work with my KX3 for roving.BTW, I also purchased the spare 222 power module that Zack referenced - it was an operational pull and worked fine.  The seller threw in an extra one which was a nice surprise.
Im going to invest in a rover 222 yagi.  I did pick up a 220 mhz yagi a while back when there was a large quantity of them available from Wisconsin - some type of wind profiling system (?) got dismantled and these were available very cheap.  Solid build with large diameter elements.  

The last for me to pick up is an amplifier - either a vintage RF concepts if I find one at a ham fest or new one in the 100 W range.
73 MikeAA9IL 

    On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 10:51 AM, James Duffey <jamesduffey at comcast.net> wrote:
 

 In preparation for the January ARRL VHF contest, W7QQ had two of the Transverters Store’s 222MHz transverters in his shack. These are the inexpensive, $125 fully assembled and packaged, less as boards, transverters available on eBay or from the manufacturer. 

As the reports of the transmit quality of these units are varied, some say they are OK, others say that the transmit quality is horrible, we decided to look at the transmit properties of the transverters. A short description of the results of those measurements are on the NM VHF Society Page:

< http://www.nmvhf.org/technical.html >

We found that one of the units had acceptable IMD performance and one unit was poor. This would explain the mixed reports. Upon further investigation, we found that the unit with poorer IMD performance had a lower final gate bias, 2.8V, than the good unit had at 3.1V. When the gate bias on the unit with the poor performance was increased to 3.1V, its performance substantially improved. The paper shows how the adjustment, which is straight forward, was done. 

Here are the IMD test results on the two units:

Transverter 3rd order IMD Performance
Power Out (watts)    Unit One     Unit Two (after bias adjustment)
7.5            -12 dB            -10 db
5            -20 dB            -18dB
2.5            -28 dB            -24 dB

Two of the locals ran theses two units in the January ARRL contest and their signals sounded fine on the air.  

If you have one of these units, or are going to purchase one make sure that the final gate bias is set to 3.1Vdc or greater prior to putting it on the air. If you have a spectrum analyzer, you can look at the IMD while changing the final gate bias, if not, set it to 3.1Vdc according to the instructions in the paper. If it is already 3.1Vdc or greater, you are probably OK. There is probably room for further improvement as the internal settings for the drive potentiometer and the variable inductors on the two units differed. When we get the opportunity, we will look at this closer. 

If the power is kept below 5W, these should be acceptable on the air. If you are driving an amplifier, then you should probably keep the drive to 2.5W or less.

The transverter boards for all of the VHF/UHF bands are similar, but we did not make measurements on transverters for other bands. I would expect the results to be similar, but not identical. If you have one of these units and measure the gate bias, I would like to know what it was before and after adjusting it.  - Duffey KK6MC

--
KK6MC
James Duffey
Cedar Crest NM





_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting