[WriteLog] Re: SCC RTTY rules propossal

Bruce Lifter, WT4I wt4i@brevard.net
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 02:46:40 -0500


I am with Don on this one...

The RTTY contests outside the big 3 can already be painfully slow. To further
limit
the rate by imposing a 10 band change rule is crazy. Given the band change rule,
I will probably play in SARTG the weekend before and skip the SCC. (Even if the
SARTG does not have a low power category.)

73, Bruce

Don AA5AU writes:
>
> The rules look good to me except the band change limits.  I'm curious
> why all the interest in
> limiting band changes for single ops?  This doesn't seem like a good
> idea.  Instead of
> discouraging SO2R with this rule, you should add an unlimited single
> operator category
> that has no band change restrictions and allowed to use the
> Packetcluster.  That way
> SO2R operators can run at will and not disadvantage single radio
> operators.  If I can only
> make 10 band changes using my other radio and be burdened with the
> unfamiliar task of
> keeping track of band changes, I'd probably do better fishing that weekend.
>
> Limiting band changes for single operators is a bad idea altogether.
> This also discourages
> moving multipliers from band to band to band to maximize multipliers.
>  Keeping track of
> these band changes has got to be a nightmare, even with just a single radio.
>
> I hope the fish are biting that weekend.
>
> 73, Don AA5AU


--
WWW:                      http://www.writelog.com/
Submissions:              writelog@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-writelog@contesting.com