[WriteLog] Re: 2001 CQ/RJ RTTY WPX UBNs.

[Bill Inkrote]

NO   your all wrong Paul

the ones that get WACKED are the operators that GUESS at the call instead of
asking for 4 repeats.

I have NEVER been WACKED by working a casual operator.... NEVER - and I make
at least 15,000 contest QSO's EVERY YEAR .....

Stop this spreading of FALSE information......

Casual operators that work a few (or one) contest station are what makes
that contest station win.

If you ONLY worked other contest stations... then EVERYONE would have
EXACTLY the same score.....   Think about it!

Bill K2NJ

This thread is way past its prime...

----- Original Message -----
From: <PaulKB8N@aol.com>
To: <SteveBaron@starlinx.com>; <k4sb@mindspring.com>; <wf1b-rtty@wf1b.com>;
<writelog@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Re: 2001 CQ/RJ RTTY WPX UBNs.


>
> And herein lies the rub, and not just with RTTY contesting, it applies to
phone and CW too.
>
> Those stations that work the "marginal" other stations get whacked on UBN
for those errors.  What I mean by "marginal" stations are those that
casually operate, often don't send in a log, may use a paddle on CW instead
of a memory keyer (inducing more possible errors), and are more inclined to
logging errors.
>
> Sometimes, these guys think they are doing us a favor by sending in logs,
unfortunately, bad error-filled logs are worse than none at all.
>
> Paul, K5AF
>
> --
> WWW:                      http://www.writelog.com/
> Submissions:              writelog@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-writelog@contesting.com
>
>


--
WWW:                      http://www.writelog.com/
Submissions:              writelog@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-writelog@contesting.com