[WriteLog] Curious?? (long)

[Richard B. Drake]

I've never used TR so guess I don't know what I am missing. But I was really
impressed with WL in the CQWW DX CW this weekend. Since I did only search
and pounce using the band map for spots, I worked the whole contest using
nothing more that my mouse and two function keys. Never touched the paddle,
the radio or the rotor and never had to type in a single thing. It was click
on a callsign, F1 to send my call, F2 to send my response, enter to log it
and on to the next one.  I've also already submitted my log. That took about
5 minutes to do after the contest was over. I simply can't imagine how some
other program could beat that!

----
73, Rich - W3ZJ

> -----Original Message-----
> From: writelog-admin@contesting.com
> [mailto:writelog-admin@contesting.com]On Behalf Of WA9ALS - John
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:40 AM
> To: bob.wruble@verizon.net; Jerry Ford; WriteLog@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Curious?? (long)
>
>
> From: <bob.wruble@verizon.net>
> To: WA9ALS - John <wa9als@starband.net>; Jerry Ford
> <benlightnd13@home.com>;
> <WriteLog@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Curious?? (long)
>
>
> > i think wl is great for rtty but its got a long way to go to
> > equal or outdo TR especially for CW contesting!
>
> Just curious - like what?  I don't use DOS or TR - Tell me what
> I'm missing.
> Does it decode the CW and dup and mult check for you without any
> intervention AT ALL on your part?  I find that alone very strong.
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>