[WriteLog] Request for additional functionality - CW numeric abbreviations
ronsue
ronsue@attbi.com
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:41:47 -0400
I agree. At 3:00 A.M. the mind gets cloudy and cut numbers beyond 1, 9 and
0 tend to confuse more than help. I have found guys running a frequency
using cut numbers, but they couldn't copy cut numbers when they got them in
response. Puts all the burden on the search and pounce guy.
Ron ND5S
----- Original Message -----
From: <Georgek5kg@aol.com>
To: <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Cc: <writelog@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Request for additional functionality - CW numeric
abbreviations
> In a message dated 8/14/2002 7:30:51 AM Greenwich Standard Time,
> bob@cytanet.com.cy writes:
>
>
> > Ideally, Writelog would have a switch to enable abbreviated numerals in
all
> > exchange fields sent, EXCEPT for the call field.
>
> NO, please no more cut numbers. I know they are popular with the European
> ops, but beyond "N" for "9" and "A" for "1" they get waaaaaaaaaaay
> toooooooooo confusing!
>
> IMHO.
>
> 73, Geo...
>
>
> George I. Wagner, K5KG
> Productivity Resources LLC
> 941-312-9450
> 941-312-9460 fax
> 201-415-6044 cell
>
>
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
> ---
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>