[WriteLog] Re: NCJ

[Stan Staten]

Sure, I was inundated with ARRL/NCJ/etc. messages that really belong on
another reflector and it went on and on.  Give it a break.  I subscribe here
for help with Writelog, which by the way is great, not help in combating the
ARRL.  When I go on vacation I will need to unsubscribe if for no other
reason than those who like to spout off will overload the system mailbox.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Forsyth [mailto:jim@forsyth.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 6:45 PM
To: n3hs@qsl.net
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Re: NCJ


Not sure what you mean, please explain.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stan Staten" <n3hs@qsl.net>
To: "Writelog" <writelog@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 12:34 PM
Subject: RE: [WriteLog] Re: NCJ


> Can we give it a break?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: writelog-admin@contesting.com
> [mailto:writelog-admin@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Jim Forsyth
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 3:14 PM
> To: writelog@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Re: NCJ
>
>
> Interesting, other directors have said it was unanimous. I wonder who is
> right.
>
> Jim
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
> To: "Jim Forsyth" <jim@forsyth.net>; <writelog@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 8:24 AM
> Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Re: NCJ
>
>
> > Nope ... K5UR has stated he voted against it.
> >
> > > I believe the vote was unanimous to exclude the line scores.
> >
> > 73 Billy AA4NU
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > WriteLog mailing list
> > WriteLog@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
>