[WriteLog] Writelog on RTTY

[Jerry Flanders]

I am not so sure it is the decoding ability of MMTTY that people prefer. Is 
there really a difference in decode performance? I use MMTTY instead of 
Wayne's Rttyrite unit only because of the MMTTY display. I use the FFT and 
Waterfall displays in MMTTY, and especially like the waterfall.

Of these two, If the tuning displays were similar, I would prefer Wayne's 
unit for actual copy because of the additional "wide-band decode" feature.

Actually comparing different TUs for copy accuracy would be a big job. I 
hope to do it some day when I get a round tuit.

Jerry W4UK


At 12:45 2/11/03 -0500, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
>At 05:26 PM 2/11/2003 +0000, kk9a at arrl.net wrote:
>
>>All of the RTTY discussion did catch my interest and I will download MMTTY
>>and make up a TX cable so I too can play around on this mode also.
>
>John, you don't *need* MMTTY, there is already a RTTY decode built into 
>Writelog.  Some people just prefer the decoding ability of MMTTY and RITTY.
>
>73 - Jim AD1C
>
>
>--
>Jim Reisert AD1C