[WriteLog] Writelog on RTTY

[Barry]

Jerry,
In my experience MMTTY does copy better, especially on fluttery/polar 
path signals.
Barry, W2UP

On 11 Feb 2003 Jerry Flanders wrote:

> I am not so sure it is the decoding ability of MMTTY that people prefer. Is 
> there really a difference in decode performance? I use MMTTY instead of 
> Wayne's Rttyrite unit only because of the MMTTY display. I use the FFT and 
> Waterfall displays in MMTTY, and especially like the waterfall.
> 
> Of these two, If the tuning displays were similar, I would prefer Wayne's 
> unit for actual copy because of the additional "wide-band decode" feature.
> 
> Actually comparing different TUs for copy accuracy would be a big job. I 
> hope to do it some day when I get a round tuit.
> 
> Jerry W4UK
> 
> 
> At 12:45 2/11/03 -0500, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
> >At 05:26 PM 2/11/2003 +0000, kk9a at arrl.net wrote:
> >
> >>All of the RTTY discussion did catch my interest and I will download MMTTY
> >>and make up a TX cable so I too can play around on this mode also.
> >
> >John, you don't *need* MMTTY, there is already a RTTY decode built into 
> >Writelog.  Some people just prefer the decoding ability of MMTTY and RITTY.
> >
> >73 - Jim AD1C
> >
> >
> >--
> >Jim Reisert AD1C
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WriteLog mailing list
> WriteLog at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog

--
Barry Kutner, W2UP              Internet: w2up at mindspring.com
Newtown, PA                     Frankford Radio Club