[WriteLog] WriteLog Digest, Vol 30, Issue 7

Jim Reisert AD1C jjreisert at alum.mit.edu
Thu Jun 9 07:39:34 EDT 2005


At 11:55 PM 6/8/2005, Marc Ressler wrote:

>Most of the Icom rigs need to have TRANSCEIVE OFF with WL. The problem is
>that they "babble" so much when it is on that the single wire xmt/rcv data
>line suffers from lots of collisions, and when WL tries to poll the rig,
>the request frequently gets clobbered, making it appear that updates are
>slow to infrequent. I've seen this with a 746, a 756-ProI, and a 756-ProII.

Marc, thanks for the clarification:

Writelog - ICOM transceive OFF
CT - ICOM transceive ON

73 - Jim AD1C


-- 
Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us



More information about the WriteLog mailing list