[WriteLog] Cabrillo file version
al9a at mtaonline.net
Sun May 6 17:58:05 PDT 2012
Thanks for the correction Randy. My old age dotage is really beginning to
show! The problem I've seen recently in Cabrillo files created with V2.0
resulted from using the adif2cabr converter, not WL! I shall readdress my
comments directly to Marek and inquire if he can update his fine converter
to the latest standards.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd at charter.net>
To: "'Gary AL9A'" <al9a at mtaonline.net>; "'Writelog Reflector'"
<writelog at contesting.com>
Sent: May 06, 2012 4:16 PM
Subject: RE: [WriteLog] Cabrillo file version
> The version of Writelog I am using (11.04) creates Cabrillo files in v3.0
> format. I think it has been this way for a long time.
> Randy, K5ZD
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: writelog-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:writelog-
>> bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Gary AL9A
>> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 12:07 AM
>> To: Writelog Reflector
>> Subject: [WriteLog] Cabrillo file version
>> Meant to send this last week, but forgot. I've started noticing recently
>> that several contest sponsors are requesting that Cabrillo files be
>> created to V3.0 stamdards. Cabrillo files created with WL are still
>> V2.0 standards in creating the file. I'm not sure what all the
>> differences are, but it seems like it is mostly related to header terms.
>> I think the JIDX contest rules required the Cabrillo to be in V3.0
>> Their web page showed the report header terminology and the column
>> After creating the Cabrillo with WL I had to go in and edit many of the
>> header terms and add a missing "0" from column 80 that they required
>> before they would accept my Cabrillo file. Any plans to upgrade the
>> Cabrillo output to the latest version soon?
>> Gary AL9A
>> WriteLog mailing list
>> WriteLog at contesting.com
>> WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog.com/
More information about the WriteLog