[WriteLog] Cabrillo problems in JARTS

[Jon Suehiro]

How long does it take JARTS 'robot' (or human inspection) to reject the log
file ?

I have submitted mine one hour after the end of the contest.   So far, I am
not rejected.


START-OF-LOG: 3.0
LOCATION: NA
CALLSIGN: NN5T
CATEGORY-OPERATOR: Class-B (Single Op, All Band, Low  Power)
CATEGORY-ASSISTED: NON-ASSISTED
CATEGORY-STATION: FIXED
CATEGORY-TRANSMITTER: ONE
CLAIMED-SCORE: 86420
CLUB: North Texas Contest Club
CONTEST: JARTS-WW-RTTY
CREATED-BY: WriteLog V11.30C



-----Original Message-----
From: WriteLog [mailto:writelog-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Gary
AL9A
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 11:04 PM
To: 'WriteLog Reflector'
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo problems in JARTS

Don, Phil and the group,

I haven't submitted my JARTS Cabrillo log yet, but did go back and recheck
some previous year submissions.  My Cabrillo history logs agree with the
format produced in this latest contest by V11.30C.  In 2012 it was V11.07D,
2013 was V11.14B, 2014 was V11.22G.  All of these indicate they are Cabrillo
V3 files and I don't recall having any of them rejected by the JARTS robot. 
Guess I'll just go ahead and send in the log and see what happens.

73,
Gary AL9A

-----Original Message----- 
From: Phil Cooper
Sent: October 19, 2015 9:10 AM
To: 'Don AA5AU' ; 'WriteLog Reflector'
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Cabrillo problems in JARTS

Don and the group,

I noticed the same issues here when creating the Cabrillo file. This was
with WL v11.27H.  I have not yet got around to updating the program, as I
hate doing this just before a contest.

I did note that the header lines imply it is Cabrillo v3, yet the fields do
not seem to comply with what is shown on the JARTS website as relating to
v3.

I have LOCATION: EU, which is wrong, as I think it should be DX. It also
created a line for CATEGORY-OPERATOR (which is v3) but then had me down as
Single Op, Low Power, All Band, which is not correct either, and also showed
Class A.

Out of curiosity, I had a quick look at the Cabrillo header from last year,
and this is what is shows:
START-OF-LOG: 3.0
LOCATION: EU
CALLSIGN: GU0SUP
CATEGORY-OPERATOR: Class-A (Single Op, All Band, High Power)
CATEGORY-TRANSMITTER: ONE
CLAIMED-SCORE: 113262
CLUB: DRCG
CONTEST: JARTS-WW-RTTY
CREATED-BY: WriteLog V11.22G

So that was also wrong as well. As far as I can see, I didn't alter it, so I
am not sure what went on, although it must have been accepted at the time.

This year, as well as last, I selected LOW POWER in Writelog's Create
Cabrillo window, and yet it has done the same this year, and put me in the
high power class.

I wonder when it went wrong?

73 de Phil GU0SUP


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/ 

_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/