[WriteLog] WAE - CABRILLO

GW4BLE steve.gw4ble at btconnect.com
Wed Sep 16 12:28:27 EDT 2015



> 
> Oh.  That hasn't always been the case surely?    I always type the QTC exactly as received from the DX station, the DX will say maybe the hour for the first number and just the minutes for the others.


So.....I've had to edit my cabrillo file in order for the robot to accept it. Had to do it several times in fact. This seems fundamentally wrong to me. 'What-if' I made a mistake in this post contest editing and then got penalised.   I make the point that we should log what is sent by the DX station and should *not* edit it afterward.    


Steve
GW4BLE

Sent from my iPhone 5S

> On 16 Sep 2015, at 16:15, GW4BLE <steve.gw4ble at btconnect.com> wrote:
> 
> Re:
> 
>> 
>> a four figure UTC time is required for the QTC exchange.
>> YU2DBZ is OK but then your log shows 22 and 24 instead of 0022 and 0024.
> 
> 
> Oh.  That hasn't always been the case surely?    I always type the QTC exactly as received from the DX station, the DX will say maybe the hour for the first number and just the minutes for the others.   
> 
> Steve
> GW4BLE
> 
> Sent from my iPhone 5S
> 
>> On 16 Sep 2015, at 15:57, GL-DJ3IW-Web <GL-DJ3IW at web.de> wrote:
>> 
>> Yes Steve,
>> 
>> a four figure UTC time is required for the QTC exchange.
>> YU2DBZ is OK but then your log shows 22 and 24 instead of 0022 and 0024.
>> 
>> 73 de Goetz DJ3IW
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: WriteLog [mailto:writelog-bounces at contesting.com] Im Auftrag von
>>> GW4BLE
>>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. September 2015 14:09
>>> An: writelog at contesting.com
>>> Betreff: [WriteLog] WAE - CABRILLO
>>> 
>>> Used WL 11.28J in last weekend's WAE and when submitting the log to the
>>> DARC web site it's
>>> reporting an error in the Cabrillo file.    I've inspected the file and
>>> can see to error.
>>> 
>>> Not sure if this is a DX, or European entry problem,  anyone from Europe
>>> had any such
>>> issues please?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Error in line  #44: Format error in log lines, likely with your sent
>>> exchange.
>>> But check also for missing or incorrect entries in other parts of the log
>>> lines:
>>>>>> QTC:  7096 PH 2015-09-12 0027 GW4BLE        4/10       PW2D          22
>>> E7DX
>>> 27  <<<
>>> 
>>> 
>>> #41     QSO:  7068 PH 2015-09-12 0024 GW4BLE        59  21     YW4D
>>> 59  015
>>> #42     QSO:  7096 PH 2015-09-12 0027 GW4BLE        59  22     PW2D
>>> 59  39
>>> #43     QTC:  7096 PH 2015-09-12 0027 GW4BLE        4/10       PW2D
>>> 0022 YU2DBZ
>>> 2


More information about the WriteLog mailing list