[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Plate RFC choke design

To: <>
Subject: [AMPS] Plate RFC choke design
From: (Rich Measures)
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 98 20:10:26 -0800
>Hi Guys....   Just one comment
>-----Original Message-----
>From:  Rich Measures []
>Sent:  Friday, March 27, 1998 6:06 AM
>That's the popular, traditional, cherished, old theory, at least.
>However, orienting two coils end-to-end seemed to me like it would
>enhance coupling, not decoupling.  .  I built various hv rf chokes to see
>check the cherished theory out.   I observed that chokes wound with the
>supposed anti-resonance gaps have pretty much the same resonances as a
>same-L choke wound without gaps.
>[Richard W. Ehrhorn]  ...... Agreed 100% emphatically, Rich. I wonder if 
>anyone ever really analyzed the old variable-diameter and/or multi-section 
I never tested a variable-diameter design.  //  It looks to me like your 
e-mailer is not doing attribute marks correctly at the beginning of each 


R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K   

FAQ on WWW:     
Administrative requests:

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>