Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re:

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re:
From: gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU (George T. Daughters)
Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 09:03:49 +0008
hi all,

> Transforming 100 j+0  ohms to 100k j+0 ohms by a single reactance is 
> seemingly a bit of a 
> stretch.  

it looks like a snap to me! i've got no resistance ("0"), a pure 
reactance (+j100 ohms).  i want to go straight out the +imaginary 
axis from 100 ohms to 100k ohms.  so, i add an inductor in series 
with the existing 100j + 0 that has a reactance of j99.9k (+0);  the 
total is now j100k + 0, isn't it? i used a "single" reactance to 
transform the given impedance to the desired impedance.  i think that 
one was too easy... what am i missing?  

73,
George T. Daughters, K6GT

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>