Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re:

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re:
From: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Tue, 19 May 98 09:58:52 -0500
>>> 2) Never met Ian, but the gut feeling grows that anyone who challenges him 
>>>in the area of network analysis or any fundamental EE stuff has a real good 
>>>chance of losing. Very respectable stuff, Ian - I appreciate it.
>
>However, adding a bit of X to make one's calculations come out more 
>favourably, undoubtedly gives one a leg up.

The 200 nH is inductance for the anode lines to the blocking cap were a 
guess by Ian.  So the inductance is less.  It still doesn't change the 
mathematical principles.  Also, as we have discussed recently, the job of 
the resistor is not to abosrb oscillations, but supress them.  So wether 
the 100 Ohms is transformed to 1K or 100K by inductances makes no 
difference.  The math still holds.

73,

Jon
KE9NA
 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Ogden

jono@webspun.com
www.qsl.net/ke9na

"A life lived in fear is a life half lived."


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>