Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Why class B??

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Why class B??
From: Lane C. Zeitler" <km3g@cts.com (Lane C. Zeitler)
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 1998 07:26:40 -0700

-----Original Message-----
From: James D. Duffer <jduffer@mnsinc.com>
To: Jon Ogden <jono@enteract.com>
Cc: AMPS@contesting.com <AMPS@contesting.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Date: Tuesday, July 07, 1998 5:55 AM
Subject: Re: [AMPS] Why class B??


>
>Jon Ogden wrote:
>>
>> >Class AB is roughly ten times cleaner than Class B.
>>
>> True.  I'd agree.
>>
>> >
>> >> Generally, class B is probably sufficient for SSB as
>> >>long as you don't overdrive it very hard.
>> >>
>> >Not if you expect to avoid being tarred and feathered at the next DX
>> >convention.
>>
>> <giggle>  Yes, I guess you are right, Rich.  Splattering is not fun to be
>> accused of nor good to do!  There are people though who do run B on their
>> PAs.  Guess that's why I said "probably sufficient."  If you wish to run
>> class B just don't go to the convention! :-)
>
>....or operate CW only and go Class C.

What could one expect the efficiency to be??

Lane KM3G
>
>73 Jim  WD4AIR
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
>Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>