Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Parasitic suppressors/another question,

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Parasitic suppressors/another question,
From: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 17:25:44 -0400


On Thu, 8 Apr 1999 11:13:44 -0700 Rich Measures <measures@vc.net> writes:
>
ALL SNIPPED

>>> 
>>> This is somewhat of the principle behind a load pull test.  You 
>either 
>>> short out or open circuit the output of an amp and then rotate it 
>around 
>>> the Smith chart (via Ctune).  Also, the tank inductor generally 
>provides 
>>> a large enough reactive impedance to VHF energy that it likely 
>doesn't 
>>> matter wether you have a load on or not.
>
>?  amen. In parasite-arced bandswitches, damage occurs primarily on 
>the 
>10m and 15m taps.  .  


Completely subjective and unproven Rich.

 
Another option which I subscribe to is Peters/Ians  version when it comes
to parasitics.

In a real amp that is 100% stable to start with, the switch failures are
primarily due to the mfg trying to save a few $$  and using a poor
initial choice .
Before the doubters wind up in a snit I suggest that they take a real
look at the specs of the commonly used switches and try to understand
exactly what they are spending money on.

73  Carl KM1H

___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>