Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] TL-922 Filament Transformer Protection

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] TL-922 Filament Transformer Protection
From: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 08:52:30 -0700


>
>> Could have been an HF oscillation for all I know as I didn't have a freq
>> counter at the time to measure them.  I guess I could have used my MFJ-259
>> but didn't think about that until now!  Needless to say, without the
>> series RC suppressors on the cathode, when keyed with zero drive and as
>> the tune C was reduce to minimum, the grid and anode currents would
>> increase.  Putting the RC networks in, eliminated this problem.  Wether it
>> was HF or VHF, I can't say, but regardless the tube was stabilized.
>
>
>I've seen amps unstable at HF stabilized by that technique. The SB-
>220 has an RF choke in parallel with silver mica caps. The RF 
>choke has multiple periodic resonances where it goes from 
>inductive to capacitive. At  one VLF and a few other higher 
>frequencies, the grids are not even grounded for RF!

?   SB-220s typically exhibit grid-resonance at approx.  90MHz.  To 
observe this,  one needs a dipmeter.   A fun experiment is to directly 
gnd the grid and re-measure the resonant freq.  
>
>The worse thing in the 220 and other GG triode PA's are the use of 
>mica caps to float the grids. While the engineers were assured that 
>would add negative feedback and improve IMD, 

?  By Mr. Bill Orr

>it actually makes a 
>mess of the feedback and makes the IMD get a bit worse........

-  later, Tom


Rich...

R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures  


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>