>
>sm5ki wrote:
>>
>>Dear Ian:
>>
>>I am just looking into the recent edition of PAT HAWKERS Technical Topics
>>Scrapbook page 109 which is a reprint of the September 1991 issue of RSGBs
>>RADIO COMMUNICATION in which G2DAF says the IMD of a single 813, as
>>indicated on on-air reports, to be some 45 down in relation to the wanted
>>voice sideband signal . Not very scientific and accurate but still an
>>indication the DAF can not be as bad as reported on this reflector. There is
>>more on the DAF on page 225 a reprint from the September 1993 issue.
>>
>>45 dB refered to what . Pep? There must be some accurate spec analyzer
>>measurments made in the past. Ian, you are near the RSGB and are in the
>>position to find out?
>>
>Something wrong with the dates there: G2DAF himself could not have said
>those things in 1991 or 1993, because he died in the mid-1970s.
>
? How about arrangin' for a second coming, Ian?
cheers.
- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|