Dear Steve,
The 4CX800A (GU-74B) tube is rated at about 800 W, the 4CX1600 (GS-23B)
is rated at 1600 - 2000 W and works well over 1000 mHz.
More technical data in English can be found at my site at
http://www.qsl.net/ut7ct
73 !
-----------
UT7CT Ham Radio Devices - Fine range of CT
Hand Keys & Paddles. Collectable keys. Svetlana
PA tubes and much more at http://www.qsl.net/ut7ct
tony@uch.net ICQ#19487420
-----Èñõîäíîå ñîîáùåíèå-----
Îò: Steve Bookout <nj4f@erols.com>
Êîìó: amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com>
Äàòà: 27 ôåâðàëÿ 2000 ã. 1:40
Òåìà: [AMPS] 4CX800's vs 4CX1600
>
>Hello all,
>
>Anyone care to comment on what the advantages/disadvantages of either tube
>arrangement in an amp, all other things being relatively equal.
>
>I would expect mainly the cost.
>
>73 de Steve, NR4M
>
>---------------------------------------------
>Steve Bookout, NR4M (ex NJ4F)
>Rapidan Data Systems
>
>'DX4WIN...The way logging programs should be!'
>Free demo at http://www.erols.com/pvander
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
>Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|