Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] 4CX800's vs 4CX1600

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] 4CX800's vs 4CX1600
From: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 14:30:16 +0000
UT7CT --> Anton Koval wrote:
>
>    The 4CX800A (GU-74B) tube is rated at about 800 W, the 4CX1600 (GS-23B)
>is rated at 1600 - 2000 W and works well over 1000 mHz.

The 4CX1600B (pin base) and the 4CX1600U (GS23B, coaxial base) are NOT
two versions of the same tube - they are completely different tubes,
with different electrical characteristics. 

The anode dissipation just happens to be the same, which gives them the
same "4CX1600" root name under the regular naming system.

The -B is a standard Svetlana product, made in their St Petersburg
factory and available in the USA. 

The -U is not even a Svetlana tube. It is made at an independent factory
in the Ukraine. Svetlana were  intending to market it, and got as far as
an interim data sheet, but backed off because of difficulties in
guaranteeing supplies in commercial quantities. For amateur quantities,
the well-known sources in the Ukraine seem very reliable. 


73 from Ian G3SEK          Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book'
                          'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
                           http://www.ifwtech.demon.co.uk/g3sek

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>