> > You then go on to say:
> >
> > > Too true. Too bad some people don't understand the laws of physics.
> >
> > There is no law of physics that forbids the behavior described.
> >
> > I'm a physicist; I would know.
>
> Then you better read Richard Measures claims.
> ...
etc, etc, etc.
Non sequitur. I said nothing about Rich's claims. My criticizing his critics
doesn't mean that I'm defending him or agreeing with him. He doesn't need my
help anyway.
I reiterate:
It is possible for a circuit to be stable under thermal voltages or other
small excitations and yet go into sustained oscillation following receipt of
a sufficiently large and/or sufficiently well-timed transient excitation.
I'll come up an example or two if you'd like.
Respectfully submitted,
Carl WS7L
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|