Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

SV: [AMPS] Inrush Current

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: SV: [AMPS] Inrush Current
From: sm5ki@algonet.se (sm5ki)
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 06:55:41 +0000
> DETTA MEDDELANDE ?R I MIME-FORMAT. P? grund av att din e-postl?sare inte 
> f?rst?r
detta format, kommer hela eller delar av detta meddelande inte att vara l?sbart.

--MS_Mac_OE_3039576941_83854_MIME_Part
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

I have heard of at least three ALPHA amps that had 8877 broken filaments.
Maybe the 8877s had this problem only during a short period? Maybe this
problem has has not been mentioned  by EIMAC  in the 8877 data sheet editio=
n
Rich is reading but in an earlier edition? Why not settle this question onc=
e
for all by just asking Reid Brandon at EIMAC? Anyway, to protect your
investment in the very expensive 8877, limit the inrush current just to be
sure. The parts costs is only about the same as a few cigarette packages!

73s de Hans
----------
Fr=E5n: Marv Gonsior <w6frmarv@pacbell.net>
Till: amps@contesting.com
=C4mne: [AMPS] Inrush Current
Datum: tis 25 apr 2000 20.28


Gents:

Phil, K5PC, urged limiting heater inrush current on indirectly heated tubes
like the 8877.  I also believe, despite that Eimac does not specify limitin=
g
for the 8877, that it is good engineering practice to do so in amateur
service.

I have used Keystone Carbon Company's negative temperature coefficient
thermisters in this application with a very nice, slow ramp up in the
voltage.  They are available in many sizes from Digi-Key at little cost but
you have to negotiate their minimum order policy by working it thru their
petty cash or find some friends.

73,

Marv, W6FR


--MS_Mac_OE_3039576941_83854_MIME_Part
Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>SV: [AMPS] Inrush Current</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR=3D"#FFFFFF">
I have heard of at least three ALPHA amps that had 8877 broken filaments. M=
aybe the 8877s had this problem only during a short period? Maybe this probl=
em has has not been mentioned &nbsp;by EIMAC &nbsp;in the 8877 data sheet ed=
ition Rich is reading but in an earlier edition? Why not settle this questio=
n once for all by just asking Reid Brandon at EIMAC? Anyway, to protect your=
 investment in the very expensive 8877, limit the inrush current just to be =
sure. The parts costs is only about the same as a few cigarette packages!<BR=
>
<BR>
73s de Hans<BR>
----------<BR>
Fr=E5n: Marv Gonsior &lt;w6frmarv@pacbell.net&gt;<BR>
Till: amps@contesting.com<BR>
=C4mne: [AMPS] Inrush Current<BR>
Datum: tis 25 apr 2000 20.28<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE>Gents:<BR>
<BR>
Phil, K5PC, urged limiting heater inrush current on indirectly heated tubes=
 like the 8877. &nbsp;I also believe, despite that Eimac does not specify li=
miting for the 8877, that it is good engineering practice to do so in <U>ama=
teur</U> service.<BR>
<BR>
I have used Keystone Carbon Company's negative temperature coefficient ther=
misters in this application with a very nice, slow ramp up in the voltage. &=
nbsp;They are available in many sizes from Digi-Key at little cost but you h=
ave to negotiate their minimum order policy by working it thru their petty c=
ash or find some friends.<BR>
<BR>
73,<BR>
<BR>
Marv, W6FR<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>

--MS_Mac_OE_3039576941_83854_MIME_Part--


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>