Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Practical PI Nets

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Practical PI Nets
From: RMcGraw@blomand.net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX)
Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 20:35:46 -0500
I seem to recall being told to "tune the plate capacitor to the right
side of resonance".  This gave a plate current indication of slightly
off of the true dip in current.  As I recall, this produced a noticeable
increase in efficency.  Hence, the tank was not tuned at resonance but
slightly higher in frequency as the capacitor was reduced in C as it was
turned to the right or clockwise.  

Is this what you guys are speakin of?  This appears opposite of what
Dave indicated.

73
Bob K4TAX



> >Rich,
> >
> >Could you give an approximation to guesstimate the difference in the
> >apparent
> >measured frequency and the operating frequency?
> 
> As I recall, on 80m the difference is typically hundreds of kilohertz,
> with the resonance of the tank being lower than the operating frequency
> where the tank was adjusted.
> 
> > Or what factors determine
> >the difference ?
> >
> The biggest factor is Q.  The higher the Q, the less the difference.
> 
> later, Dave
> 
> -  Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
> end
> 
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
> Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
> Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>