A true definition of resonance has to work in all systems, be it hydraulic,
mechanical or electrical. Then you figure out how to express it for the
system you are working in.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Chadwick <Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com>
To: Peter Chadwick <Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com>; 'amps' <amps@contesting.com>;
'measures' <2@vc.net>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Date: 03 May 2000 06:32
Subject: RE: [AMPS] Practical PI Nets
>
>Rich says:
>
>>Resonance is where yo' dipmeter finds it. . If the dipmeter does not
>>dip on a certain frequency, the tank circuit is not resonant on that
>>frequency. . .
>
>Rich, you sound like Humpty Dumpty - 'Words mean what I want them to'
>
>First you defined resonance as where XL = XC. Now it's where the dip meter
finds
>it. For circuits with low Q, they aren't the same.
>
>Sure, you can ignore the theory for a lot of the time and get there by
'green
>fingers'. It doesn't always work, and can lead others astray. The only
>definition of resonance truly applicable is that applied voltage and
current are
>in phase. As the plate wants to see a flywheel tank with a resistive input,
>that's the desired resonance - not the dip meter, not XL = XC.
>
>73
>
>Peter G3RZP
>
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
>Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|