Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] CBers

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] CBers
From: sheepdip@continet.com (Larry L. Ravlin)
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:19:02 -0700
Thats not what Tom said, thats what you said and he is right abt band use
legal operators have an inferred priority over illegal users by right of
their license.

Larry L. Ravlin AKA (Laurence the Magnificent)
"Collins Equipt forever"
Ham Radio Operator AA7LR ex KØAEY
Walterville, Or.
sheepdip@continet.com

"this is not a rice storage facility"
 

  






 




 
 




 

----------
> From: Jeff Wolf <da_kang@hotmail.com>
> To: W8JI@contesting.com; amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [AMPS] CBers
To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Date: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 10:24 AM
> 
> 
> >Most use simple voice inversion, and I would venture to guess it is
>>the 
> >Palomar VC100 in use.
> >>However, you now advocate jamming?
> 
> >I know this is in conflict with the "freebanders code of radio ethics",
> >but a licensed transmission takes priority over one with no legal
> >right or legitimate reason to use a frequency. However, thanks for
> >all your valuable technical contributions.
> >73, Tom W8JI
> >w8ji@contesting.com
> 
> 
> There is no code of ethics.
> 
> This is a simple case of a respected manufacturer, amplifier expert, 
> published author, licensed US Amateur operator, and member of the amps 
> reflector telling people in a worldwide forum he advocates jamming.  Put 
> simple enough, eh?
> 
> Yes, lets get back to technical debates, not debates based on 
> technicalities.
> 
> It boils down to this:  Most all of the people here who have spent the
last 
> week bashing CBers, if approached by an admitted CBer to be elmered,
would 
> respond with distaste.
> 
> I wonder why the amateur bands have gone to pot.
> 
> People here complain about the CB crowd that has "migrated" to the
amateur 
> bands.  Take a good look at the calls in use on 75, then look them up and

> see how long they have had their "tickets".  You will find that most of
them 
> are pre-no-code.  The 2 meter problem?  Well, the CBers that migrated
sure 
> did compound the problem, no doubt about that, but the problem was
created 
> long before the CBers got no-code.  The CBers just give the amateur 
> community in the US a good scapegoat..  "All our problems came about
because 
> of no-code.."
> 
> This is a subject that people are going to have to agree to disagree on. 
I 
> have my views, they are shared by some, others have theirs...
> 
> Toll Free
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
> 
> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
> http://profiles.msn.com.
> 
> 
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
> Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>