At 03:38 PM 5/4/2001 -0700, measures wrote:
>
>>
>>At 10:54 AM 5/4/01 -0700, you wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Rich, you keep bringing this up. The fact is that there are a lot of
experts
>>>>on this reflector, and even though most of them don't say "I'm an expert"
>>>>they demonstrate their expertise by answering questions, posting
pictures of
>>>>amps they've built, and engaging in (sometimes) helpful debate.
>>>>yourself an expert.
>>>>
>>>? The only self-declared "recognized amplifier expert" on AMPS made the
>>>statement on p.72 of the September 1994 *QST*. He also stated that the
>>>resistance of nichrome increases as frequency decreases. (sic)
>>
>>Rich. I, too, am tired of hearing this
>
>? So killfile me.
>
Arrogance !
Why ? Why should *we* have to "killfile" you, when you already know that
most (all ?) here consider this on-going crap of yours to be trivial,
pointless, and just plain bad manners. It's doubtful you have any
sympathizers here. Its likely that nearly everyone here reads these
cry-baby posts of yours, roll their eyes and hit the delete key. What a
waste of your time - writing to no one. We're not interested. You have no
audience for this stuff anymore. You appear to have as little respect for
yourself as you do for any one else.
I don't recall Tom actually declaring himself an amp expert, but according
to the definition of "Expert" you posted, that is exactly what he is. So
you finally agree... that he is an amp expert. Finally ! You point to a
statement on a page in magazine from nearly 10 years ago. I can point to
thousands of words written by you in articles in the years before that.
You wrote some good stuff. And if only a few ideas out of the many you
presented turned out to be controversial, consider yourself lucky. And
that many articles written by the same person on the subject of amplifers,
could only have been written by a person that considered himself an
*expert* (as in *self proclaimed expert*).
End
Phil
>>- can you give me hard , verifiable
>>numbers about the change in resistance of Nichrome wire with frequency, in
>>the range of, say, 30 MHz to 200MHz?
>
>? Wes' (N7WS) measurements with a HP Z-analyzer indicate this
>characteristic. . There is no conductor that exhibits an increase in
>resistance as frequency decreases.
>
>>A reference will do, because if it's
>>from your measurements, I would have to have it verufied.
>
>>CAn you also give a real quotation of the reputed statement? I have known
>>you to be hasty and miss-interpret what you read.
>>
>? True enough. The chortlish statement is in the September, 1994 QST
>under Technical Topics. . You can also read it in the Rebuttal on my
>Web site. If that's not good enough, I can mail you a xerox copy if you
>like.
>
>
>cheers, Bill
>
>>
>>
>
>
>- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
>end
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>
>
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|