Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Self oscillation with homebrew 3-1000Z ????

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Self oscillation with homebrew 3-1000Z ????
From: wd0ct@networksplus.net (Steven Moore)
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 21:13:50 -0500
Hi everybody,

I guess I'm confused. If this tube is prone to self oscillation--which is
what I get by reading this thread--why not try a different suppressor?
If it works you have saved yourself a lot of aggravation it seems.

73   Steve   wd0ct
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
To: "AMPS" <amps@contesting.com>; "Colin Lamb" <k7fm@teleport.com>
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 3:19 PM
Subject: Re: [AMPS] Self oscillation with homebrew 3-1000Z ????


>
> > Rich said: "I would bypass the high-tech research, cut to the chase,
> > and try a lower Rp suppressor".    This was in response to a method of
> > scientific approach to parasitic oscillation suppression.
> >
> > I suppose I should not comment on someone else's view, but it seems
> > rather sad to reject science and resort to a magic potion.
>
> It is also bad advice.
>
> The lowest Rp suppressor would be a direct short circuit.
>
> So what Rich is saying, in effect, is to not use any suppressor at
> all. That would be the lowest possible Rp.
>
> That is the real danger in ignoring how something works, and giving
> a canned solution.
>
>
>
>
> 73, Tom W8JI
> W8JI@contesting.com
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
> Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>
>


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>